Is this a common Hero attribute? Examining a few recent and well known texts:
Luke Skywalker in Star Wars (The original, that is, later renamed A New Hope): YES. He’s trying to get a few droids working one day, rescuing a Princess the next, streaking over a massive battle station and reinvigorating a nearly extinguished warrior tradition soon after. Seems to match when looking only at this, although he later appears to fit the Prophet mold better - at which point he is acting with much more direction and determination.
George Bailey in It’s A Wonderful Life: YES. Saves Bedford Falls from an alternate reality as Pottersville despite spending at least half of his life trying to leave it behind. That might not quite count as a transformation, although the point is that the world would have been quite different without him.
Katniss Everdeen in The Hunger Games trilogy: YES. She volunteers to save her sister, and does what’s needed to “win” for her own survival. Soon after - and evidently without her involvement, much less desire - she is the symbol for change across the continent.
Harry Potter: YES. Outsider trying hard to fit in, without understanding of how the world works, but with a number of advantages that allow him to transform from a world with the threat of Voldemort to one without him or other Death Eaters.
Wall*E: NO. Fits as well as the others, which is unfortunate, as previous analysis suggests he’s an Artist rather than a Hero. It doesn’t fit well for The Apartment (noted here as having similarities to Wall*E), though.
Indiana Jones: YES. He's a Nomad, and does not fit this description. His efforts lead to a largely unchanged world, and everyone is happier for it.
Captain America (and The Winter Soldier): YES, in both.
Still, it might be that this is a common way to structure a story, so there shouldn’t be too much read into it.
No comments:
Post a Comment